• Castellano
  • English
  • Valenciá
Página de inicio de ReDivia
Página de la Generalitat ValenciáPágina de IVIA
Visualitza element 
  •   Inici de ReDivia
  • 1.- Investigación
  • 1.4.- Proceedings
  • Visualitza element
  •   Inici de ReDivia
  • 1.- Investigación
  • 1.4.- Proceedings
  • Visualitza element
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Feasibility of using LVDT and watermark sensor for irrigation scheduling in plum

Exporta
untranslatedRefworks
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5392
DOI
10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.664.39
Derechos de acceso
openAccess
Metadades
Mostra el registre complet de l'element
Autor/a
Intrigliolo, Diego S.; Castel, Juan R.
Data
2004
Cita bibliográfica
Intrigliolo, D.S., Castel, J.R. (2004). Feasibility of using LVDT and watermark sensor for irrigation scheduling in plum. Proceedings of the Ivth International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops, (664), 317-323.
Resum
The usefulness of continuous measurements of soil and plant water status for automated irrigation scheduling was studied in a drip-irrigation experiment on plum (Prunus salicina `Black Gold'). Soil matric water potential (psi(soil)) was measured with granular matrix sensors (Watermark) and short period variations of trunk diameter (TDV) with linear variable displacement transducers (LVDT). From TDV measurements, maximum daily shrinkage (MDS), evolution of maximum trunk diameter (MXTD) and trunk growth rate (TGR) were calculated. Their performance was compared to discrete measurements of midday stem water potential (psi(stem)). The Watermark sensor data were correlated with plant water status during all the season (r(2) = 0.56**), but were highly variable (CV approximate to 35-50%). TDV parameters were better related to psi(stem) and less variable in our conditions. During most of the fruit growth period (Stages II and III), MDS was higher in the less irrigated treatments than in the control and well correlated (r(2) = 0.89**) to psi(stem). However, after harvest, when TGR was higher, this correlation decreased (r(2) = 0.73-0.52**) and so did the slope (between MDS and psi(stem)) as the season progressed, suggesting tissue elasticity changes, but then, TGR differences between control and stressed treatments were better related to plant water status.
Col·leccions
  • 1.4.- Proceedings

Visualitza

Tot ReDiviaComunitats i col·leccionsPer data de publicacióAutor/aTítolsMatèriesTemesCentres IVIAAquesta col·leccióPer data de publicacióAutor/aTítolsMatèriesTemesCentres IVIA

El meu compte

EntraRegistre

Estadístiques

Vegeu Estadístiques d'ús

D'interès

Política d'Accés Obert de l'IVIAPropietat intel·lectual i drets d'autorAutoarxiuPreguntes freqüents

Indexadores

Recolectauntranslated

El contenido de este sitio está bajo una licencia Creative Commons - No comercial - Sin Obra Derivada (by-nc-nd), salvo que se indique lo contrario.