Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabedo-López, Marc
dc.contributor.authorCruz-Miralles, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorVacas, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorNavarro-Llopis, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Hedo, Meritxell
dc.contributor.authorFlors, Victor
dc.contributor.authorJaques, Josep A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T06:30:51Z
dc.date.available2021-05-13T06:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2021es
dc.identifier.citationCabedo‑López, M., Cruz‑Miralles, J., Vacas, S., Navarro‑Llopis, V., Pérez‑Hedo, M., Flors, V., & Jaques, J. A. (2021). Correction to: The olfactive responses of Tetranychus urticae natural enemies in citrus depend on plant genotype, prey presence, and their diet specialization. Journal of Pest Science, 2021, 1-4.es
dc.identifier.issn1612-4758 (print-ISSN)
dc.identifier.issn1612-4766 (e-ISSN)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/7345
dc.description.abstractIn the original publication of the article, the authors have inadvertently presented Figs.1-4 that were prepared from an incorrect data-set and were therefore inaccurate. The corrected figures and related statistical results are published herein. In addition, data supporting the corrected figures are provided as new supplementary online material (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figs. 3-6). The ecological relevance of certain responses to particular treatments were still discussed when P-values neared 0.05 (Wasserstein et al. 2019). This was the case of the preferences of Tetranychus urticae for (a) conspecific infested plants, where Cleopatra mandarin was preferred to sour orange (P ≤ 0.058), and (b) when having to choose between clean and infested Cleopatra mandarin, where infested plants were mostly preferred (P = 0.058) (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 3). Similarly, the preferences of Euseius stipulatus and Neoseiulus californicus for T. urticae body odors were associated with a P-value of 0.058 (Figs. 2 and 3; Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). Finally, when having to choose between the same plant genotype, either infested or not, a P = 0.058 was obtained for N. californicus and sour orange (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 5) and for Phytoseiulus persimilis and both sour orange and Cleopatra mandarin (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. 6). As a consequence, the conclusions discussed in the paper remain valid.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCleopatra mandarines
dc.subjectEuseius stipulatuses
dc.subjectHerbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs)es
dc.titleCorrection to: The olfactive responses of Tetranychus urticae natural enemies in citrus depend on plant genotype, prey presence, and their diet specializationes
dc.typearticlees
dc.authorAddressInstituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Carretera CV-315, Km. 10’7, 46113 Moncada (Valencia), Españaes
dc.entidadIVIACentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnologíaes
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10340-021-01364-5es
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10340-019-01107-7
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10340-021-01364-5es
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10340-019-01107-7
dc.journal.issueNumber2021es
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pest Sciencees
dc.page.final4es
dc.page.initial1es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.source.typeelectronicoes
dc.subject.agrisH10 Pests of plantses
dc.subject.agrovocSour orangees
dc.subject.agrovocPhytoseiulus persimilises
dc.subject.agrovocNeoseiulus californicuses
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España