Killing niche competitors by remote-control bacteriophage induction
Derechos de accesoopenAccess
MetadataShow full item record
AuthorSelva, Laura; Viana, David; Regev-Yochay, Gili; Trzcinski, Krzysztof; Corpa, Juan Manuel; Lasa, Inigo; Novick, Richard P.; Penades, Jose R.
Cita bibliográficaSelva, L., Viana, David, Regev-Yochay, Gili, Trzcinski, Krzysztof, Corpa, J. M., Lasa, Inigo, Novick, Richard P., Penades, J.R. (2009). Killing niche competitors by remote-control bacteriophage induction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(4), 1234-1238.
A surprising example of interspecies competition is the production by certain bacteria of hydrogen peroxide at concentrations that are lethal for others. A case in point is the displacement of Staphylococcus aureus by Streptococcus pneumoniae in the nasopharynx, which is of considerable clinical significance. How it is accomplished, however, has been a great mystery, because H2O2 is a very well known disinfectant whose lethality is largely due to the production of hyperoxides through the abiological Fenton reaction. In this report, we have solved the mystery by showing that H2O2 at the concentrations typically produced by pneumococci kills lysogenic but not nonlysogenic staphylococci by inducing the SOS response. The SOS response, a stress response to DNA damage, not only invokes DNA repair mechanisms but also induces resident prophages, and the resulting lysis is responsible for H2O2 lethality. Because the vast majority of S. aureus strains are lysogenic, the production of H2O2 is a very widely effective antistaphylococcal strategy. Pneumococci, however, which are also commonly lysogenic and undergo SOS induction in response to DNA-damaging agents such as mitomycin C, are not SOS-induced on exposure to H2O2. This is apparently because they are resistant to the DNA-damaging effects of the Fenton reaction. The production of an SOS-inducing signal to activate prophages in neighboring organisms is thus a rather unique competitive strategy, which we suggest may be in widespread use for bacterial interference. However, this strategy has as a by-product the release of active phage, which can potentially spread mobile genetic elements carrying virulence genes.